PolicyPulse.pro

ACM Study: Solar Power Feed-in Costs Justified but Confusing for Consumers

a house with solar panels
Photo: Photo by Watt A Lot on Unsplash

The Dutch competition authority, ACM, finds that feed-in costs for solar power are reasonable, but the varying methods of calculation make it hard for consumers to compare contracts.

17.12.2025 | Dutch competition authority


The Netherlands Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) has concluded that the feed-in costs charged by energy suppliers to households with solar panels are not unreasonable. This finding comes from a recent study that examined how these costs are calculated and passed on to consumers.

ACM's study revealed that while the feed-in costs are justified based on the expenses incurred by suppliers, the methods of calculation differ significantly among suppliers. This inconsistency creates confusion for consumers, making it difficult for them to understand what they are paying for and to compare different contracts effectively.

Since 2023, many energy suppliers have started charging for the power that households with solar panels feed back into the grid. ACM has conducted multiple studies on this issue, including a follow-up study that involved information requests from 16 suppliers and pre-announced dawn raids at five of them. The findings indicate that the costs incurred by different suppliers are relatively similar, and they can adequately justify the feed-in costs they impose.

Despite the stability of these costs, ACM notes that the way they are passed on to consumers can lead to increased charges for households with solar panels. The authority advocates for a standardized method of calculating feed-in costs, suggesting that suppliers should charge based on the amount of power fed back into the grid. This recommendation aims to simplify the process for consumers and enhance transparency.

Additionally, ACM highlights the impact of the upcoming end of the net metering scheme in 2027, which is expected to reduce revenues for solar panel owners. To maximize benefits, consumers are encouraged to use the power generated by their solar panels as much as possible. Dynamic energy contracts are also emerging as a viable option for households, as they may incur lower costs for feed-in power.

In conclusion, while ACM finds the feed-in costs reasonable, it emphasizes the need for clearer and more consistent pricing methods to aid consumer understanding and choice in the energy market.

Consult source

Terms of ServicePrivacy PolicyCoverage
LinkedInFollow us on LinkedIn

© 2026 PolicyPulse. All rights reserved.