The Department of Justice's Antitrust Division, led by Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater, has officially closed its investigation into T-Mobile's proposed acquisition of UScellular. After a comprehensive review, the Division opted not to pursue an injunction against the merger, although it acknowledged significant concerns regarding competition in mobile wireless services and the availability of wireless spectrum.

During the investigation, the Department assessed the potential impact on consumers from the removal of UScellular from the market. UScellular has been recognized for its unique approach to catering to local customer needs, contrasting with the more uniform offerings of the 'Big 3' national carriers—Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile. The Department noted that UScellular's commitment to transparency and localized service has allowed it to maintain a loyal customer base, which could be adversely affected by the merger.

Additionally, the investigation explored the potential benefits for consumers if UScellular were to continue operating independently. It was determined that UScellular's limited regional presence and financial constraints would hinder its ability to invest in technology and maintain network quality. In contrast, T-Mobile's commitment to integrating the two networks promises improved service for UScellular customers, including faster data speeds and broader rural coverage.

Ultimately, the Department concluded that the potential benefits of the merger outweighed the risks of losing UScellular's localized offerings. The investigation highlighted the ongoing trend of consolidation in the wireless industry, which has left consumers with limited choices among the major carriers. The Department expressed concerns about the implications of further spectrum consolidation, which could hinder the emergence of new competitors in the market.

The statement emphasized the importance of wireless spectrum as a national resource and its critical role in fostering competition. While the Department did not find sufficient grounds to block the merger, it remains vigilant regarding future transactions that may threaten competition and consumer choice in the wireless sector.