PolicyPulse.pro

FTC Takes Action Against Digital Forensics for Deceptive Sextortion Services

brown padlock on black computer keyboard
Photo: Photo by FlyD on Unsplash

The Federal Trade Commission has filed a lawsuit against Digital Forensics Corporation and its CEO for allegedly defrauding consumers out of millions through misleading sextortion assistance services.

12.10.2026 | Federal Trade Commission


The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has successfully obtained a temporary halt on the operations of Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and its CEO, Dmitry Belkin, due to allegations of defrauding consumers with false promises related to sextortion assistance services.

Sextortion, a growing threat in the U.S., involves scammers threatening to release intimate images unless victims pay them. The FTC claims that Digital Forensics misled victims into paying over $60 million by falsely asserting they could provide effective assistance against sextortion.

According to the FTC, Digital Forensics pressured victims to purchase a 'Phase 1' package, which promised services such as tracking the sextortionist and reporting to law enforcement. However, many victims reported that these services were never delivered, despite payments ranging from $1,499 to $20,000.

After the initial payment, victims were coerced into buying 'Phase 2' services, which were also not fulfilled. To maintain a positive public image, Digital Forensics allegedly suppressed negative reviews and created fake positive testimonials.

The FTC's complaint highlights that Digital Forensics used various online platforms to target sextortion victims, making exaggerated claims about their ability to track down criminals and assist law enforcement. Instead, the company often provided minimal assistance, such as blocking the sextortionist on social media, which victims could do themselves.

The FTC alleges that Digital Forensics employed deceptive marketing tactics, including scare tactics during telemarketing calls, to pressure victims into paying for services that were not rendered. The company also misrepresented its refund policy and collected financial information under false pretenses.

The lawsuit cites violations of multiple laws, including the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule. The case has been filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, with the FTC emphasizing its commitment to protecting consumers from deceptive practices.

Consult source

Terms of ServicePrivacy PolicyCoverage
LinkedInFollow us on LinkedIn

© 2026 PolicyPulse. All rights reserved.